Don’T Get A Refund Anticipation Loan – And If An User Is Logged In

js hit counter Andthus if an user is logged in, only allow them one view across sessions/browsers/IP addresses, If the user ain'tain'twas not logged in, I'm quite sure I wouldn't mind attempting to place a cookie so they can't inadvertently run up the view count by refreshing the page.

Middleware that is decoupled from the various models I want to track and using an F expression other questions on stackoverlow have alluded to this.

The ideas for djangohitcount came from both of my two original answers, thatthatthatthat really got me started thinking about the whole thing.

js hit counterDon't know if it's a good idea to do that or not. The following code looks for an already set cookie first if it exists it increases the totalview counter if it ain't there the it increases both totalviews and uniqueviews. Both totalviews and uniqueviews are a field of a Django model.

Don't know if it's a good idea to do that or not. The following code looks for an already set cookie first if it exists it increases the totalview counter if it isn't there the it increases both totalviews and uniqueviews. Both totalviews and uniqueviews are a field of a Django model. Just think for a moment. Middleware that is decoupled from the various models I want to track and using an F expression other questions on stackoverlow have alluded to this.

The ideas for djangohitcount came from both of my two original answers, thatthatthatthat really got me started thinking about the whole thing.

js hit counter Andbasically if an user is logged in, only allow them one view across sessions/browsers/IP addresses, If the user was notis notis not logged in, I actually wouldn't mind attempting to place a cookie so they can't inadvertently run up the view count by refreshing the page.

Like fashion trends, trends in web design, come and go.

Sometimes trends are dictated by necessity. Other trends are industry shifts, similar to the change from skeuomorphism to flat design. The decision to follow a trend must depend on your needs users and your business. The decision should never be based solely on it's what the cool sites are doing. Oftentimes fads fade.

It's understandable why this is appealing. Placing navigation under a hamburger menu makes a site cleaner. Most people are familiar enough with the pattern. This was notain'twas not something that works for every site and can reduce discoverability. The consequences can be harmful for ecommerce sites and news sites, where discoverability of topics and items is critical to the experience. Did you hear of something like this before, is that the case? Forcing users to open the navigation menu in this situation may create unnecessary friction, as explained in Web Design Trends 2015 2016.

On Time's website, you'll find a various news topics hidden in the hamburger menu.

Time combats the discoverability issue with a ticker on recent side news stories. For example, there's also a search feature prominently atop the ticker. Lots of information can be found easily by going on the web. Killing Off the Global Navigation, as pointed out in an excellent Nielsen Norman Group article. One Trend to Avoid, hidden navigation could still alienate users.

Further to this, just a 2013 study showed that just 1percentage of people click on carousels. Manyplenty of simply ignore them and don't note the content, thanks to the phenomenon known as banner blindness. Essentially, you should have a good reason for their inclusion aside from that the client likes it, all of this isn't to say that you shouldn't use carousels at all in your designs. They may be carefully crafted and optimized to ensure that they don't compromise UX and accessibility, carousels can work.

The sliding animation powering carousels, for instance, is certainly an useful tool for other design elements.

For instance, you can try a sliding navigation drawer for your mobile viewport. The sliding animation allows the user to shelve and reveal content as needed, as shown in the below prototype created in UXPin with the nocode animations editor. While creating an illusion of depth, The parallax technique allows the foreground and background content to scroll at different speeds. It's debatable if it can be described as having good UX, it can be used to very good effect.

Parallax scrolling can add another dimension to a site and allow it to stand out. As we listed, there are trade offs if you want to create a site that works on both desktop and mobile, after that, parallax really was notwas notis not for you. Also, it is, even if it's a little 'cartoonlike', it's quite well done and tells a story as you move down the page. It is quite good when you want to effectively tell a story using mostly graphical elements, This is parallax strength scrolling. We put it into GT Metrix to see how it stood up to scrutiny when it came to speed, the page above has imagery, text and video embedded into it.

< >Are Hamburger Menus, Parallax Scrolling and Complex Typography a help or a hindrance, is that the case?

The page has a score of A from PageSpeed and C from YSlow, as you can see.

Take a look at the page load time … it's 182 seconds, thatthatthatthat is hugely slower than most commercial sites that you'll come across, That's not terrible. Ask yourself if the story you want to tell is worth losing visitors because of a reduction in performance, I'd say if you're considering creating a parallax site. Furthermore, parallax has to be done well and it has to be a little different with intention to capture and hold the user attention.

Back in the day when you might hit a website only to be greeted with a Flash animated load screen that you were forced to sit through before you could enter a site, right? Users will bolt from a site that takes more than 10 seconds, and that could affect your bottom line. There's nothing really to confirm our assumptions, we can assume the site has something to do with filmmaking. So URL when entered on iPad just says server can't be found, the Apple icon is good when you want to open the video in iTunes. The second example above is somewhat tedious and you find yourself watching the counter slowly climbing to 100. As the image and percentage counter is right in the screen center bottom, it's also quite dull.

< >Hiding Everything Under a Hamburger Menu.

The second example above is somewhat tedious and you find yourself watching the counter slowly climbing to 100percent.

As the image and percentage counter is right in the screen center bottom, it's also quite dull. Actually, in this example, the load screen going to be created using the below only, thatthatthatthat wobbles when you hover over certain elements. It's just enough to hold your attention. Remember, the interaction is fairly simple, it's clear that when you hover over certain elements that they can be used and this also means it doesn't affect performance too much.

Here's a good example of a fun, interactive screen load that makes good use of graphics and sounds. With a rocket at the beginning, Initially, it loads the graphics by bouncing them in one at a time. It fully loads in around four seconds and uses simple music to keep things interesting. There's plenty of interactive options, once the screen is fully loaded. I'm sure you heard about this. Elements bounce in quickly and the navigation options are clear. Known moving the mouse around also moves the stars in the background. This creates consistency with the load screen and also pays off for the user waiting.

It seems that JavaScript is everywhere these days.

Social plugins use them. On top of this, do a good proportion of WordPress plugins. UX perspective, however, JavaScript can slow down a good site. Like we said earlier, users won't stick around if a site is too slow. Whenever adding functionality, JavaScript can be highly functional in that it can be used for many things that other languages can' It can help you create great load screens, let's say, and identical styling elements similar to sliders.

JavaScript can be found in quite a few of the modern libraries and frameworks similar to Angular. Backbone. Knockout. The latter is a MVVM framework which is written entirely in JavaScript. I'm sure you heard about this. You'll only want to load the script you'll actually need on a mobile device, So in case you use it with your responsive site. JavaScript doesn't always render well on mobile devices, thatthatthatthat can clog up your speed page load. You should take this seriously. You should also use web fonts for social follow icons on website with intention to reduce JavaScript and take a glance at how much is used in any other plugins that you use.

< >Front page' Carousels.

Now don't get us wrong there's nothing wrong with JavaScript actually.

It has a bunch of great uses and allows us to do some nifty things on the web. You should reduce it doesn't make your website painful to view on a mobile device, JavaScript amount you use. The example below from the UXPin site uses fonts from the same family, a tactic that works quite well for clarity. Of course, spacing is important too and it's not essential that they might be from the same family, just that they work well together.

Minimalism inspired a raft of sites that are clean, fast and easytouse. Meanwhile responsive web design helps many businesses worry less about designing for a constant stream of new devices. There will always be some that are ill thought for any longer and tend to stick. For advice on the 10 most useful web design trends, check out the free 'ebook' Web Design Trends 2015 and The book includes 100 resources and analysis of 166 examples from companies like Google, Apple, Reebok, Intercom, Adidas, Dropbox, and others.

The comment about JS and search indexing is wrong, Google is capable of crawling JS websites and even deprecated support for AJAX crawling https.

The same thing is true about the images. It's a well-known fact that the search engines going to be able to read your image alt tags, if you program your page properly. Alt tags should suffice for images, unless you're using infographics.

< >Parallax Scrolling.

Was hoping to get more out of this post than here are some things that if implemented poorly would be considered bad trends If these trends are implemented properly, the content is well done, and you only use them sparingly, there's not much negative to be said about them.

Too lots of our clients struggle to budget for that, andtherefore thence we struggle to find stock images that can even remotely represent their complex technologies and services the way they need to be without looking too cliched.

Let's put more photographers back to work, and stop being cheap with the most important aspect of web design! Site visitors have become harden to stock images and people want something real and unique. Real content is one reason that social has exploded for marketers.

Given inaccessible train wreck broken websites commonly found here, quite a few which being artsy fartsy scam artist PSD nonsense made by people who really have little business designing a blasted thing for the Internet. It's REALLY refreshing to see an article out of you folks that basically shoots down lots of the garbage the sites you're awarding slop together any old way. YEARS.

SEO is overrated now as you can see on Google Trends.

Since 2005 almost every topic has declined in search volume. Users come to a site to be Entertained/Inspired, to shop, or to find information quickly. Know who and what you are designing for. Jane usability push content to the front. RWD sucks, as far as the mobile comments. Of course while creating unique experiences for both mobile and desktop, UX should utilize Adaptive Design. Well, on parallaxes point fooling around with SEO and such. This said, I don't see parallaxes being an unnecessary evil in webdesign -properly executed they only can benefit a website -if the site's purpose ain'twas notain't converying data only, that is. All in all, the article reads a little bit as if we'd all still be stuck in the early 2000s with low mobile speeds and horrible data plans.

Its a good post. The current click and swipe till you find something mentality means they will find it soon enough, there should be a few newbies who don't know it's the menu. Its learnable and that's good UX. I know it's now ubiquitous, and, frankly, it provides more design options, like the breadcrumb. < >Complex Load Screens. Are Hamburger Menus, Parallax Scrolling and Complex Typography a help or a hindrance, right? Hiding Everything Under a Hamburger Menu. Front page' Carousels. Parallax Scrolling. Complex Load Screens. Too Much JavaScript. < >Too Much JavaScript. Complex Typography. Good Designers Are Good Skeptics. < >Complex Typography. < >Good Designers Are Good Skeptics.